<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AGPL License</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bin-co.com/blog/2007/11/agpl-license/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bin-co.com/blog/2007/11/agpl-license/</link>
	<description>Learn about the latest in Web Development - as soon as I do.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Binny V A</title>
		<link>http://www.bin-co.com/blog/2007/11/agpl-license/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Binny V A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bin-co.com/blog/2007/11/agpl-license/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>@Niyaz
&lt;blockquote&gt;We need a mechanism by which an existing GNU GPL license gets converted into AGPL.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
If you have an application that is licensed under GPL, just license it under AGPL as well - both are compactable.

@Raj
&lt;blockquote&gt;Is GPL and AGPL recognized by law makers of any country?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Sure it is. When you create a software, you release it under a license. That means that everyone who uses that software must agree to abide by the terms in the license. In lawyer speak it could be called a contract - although I am not sure about that - I am not a lawyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Niyaz</p>
<blockquote><p>We need a mechanism by which an existing GNU GPL license gets converted into AGPL.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you have an application that is licensed under GPL, just license it under AGPL as well - both are compactable.</p>
<p>@Raj</p>
<blockquote><p>Is GPL and AGPL recognized by law makers of any country?</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure it is. When you create a software, you release it under a license. That means that everyone who uses that software must agree to abide by the terms in the license. In lawyer speak it could be called a contract - although I am not sure about that - I am not a lawyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.bin-co.com/blog/2007/11/agpl-license/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bin-co.com/blog/2007/11/agpl-license/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Binny,
That kinda of license seems to be good enough but I am wondering if it would be accepted widely. Also, I haven't really come across any news of anyone suing someone over violation of GPL license. May be you might be the first one to sue somebody for violation of AGPL ;-)

Hold on! Is GPL and AGPL recognized by law makers of any country? :o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Binny,<br />
That kinda of license seems to be good enough but I am wondering if it would be accepted widely. Also, I haven&#8217;t really come across any news of anyone suing someone over violation of GPL license. May be you might be the first one to sue somebody for violation of AGPL <img src='http://www.bin-co.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hold on! Is GPL and AGPL recognized by law makers of any country? <img src='http://www.bin-co.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niyaz PK</title>
		<link>http://www.bin-co.com/blog/2007/11/agpl-license/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Niyaz PK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bin-co.com/blog/2007/11/agpl-license/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>I think that is an excellent idea or a license. But what about existing GNU GPL licenses? We need a mechanism by which an existing GNU GPL license gets converted into AGPL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is an excellent idea or a license. But what about existing GNU GPL licenses? We need a mechanism by which an existing GNU GPL license gets converted into AGPL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
